Two Cases of Traumatic Wounds in Patients with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Successfully Treated with a Bioengineered Skin Equivalent

Author(s): 
Babak Abai, MD; Dena Thayer, DO; Paul M. Glat, MD

Introduction

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a group of heritable disorders with an incidence of approximately 1 in 5000 births.[1] It is associated with a defect in collagen formation leading to skin fragility and hyperelasticity of skin, hypermobility of joints, and poor wound healing with scarring.[2,3] It has been subdivided into separate types according to the predominant areas affected and the degree of abnormality (Table 1). Collagen plays an important part in the wound healing process, and patients with EDS have suboptimal wound healing and multiple complications following surgery secondary to defects in collagen metabolism.[4–6]

The authors treated two patients with traumatic wounds of the lower extremities with a bioengineered skin equivalent (BSE) (Apligraf®, Organogenesis, Canton, Massachusetts). Both of these patients failed to heal their wounds normally with standard wound care. BSE consists of bovine collagen and human fibroblasts and keratinocytes.[7] The fibroblasts and keratinocytes in Bse produce growth factors and antibiotic peptides creating a physiological microenvironment that can stimulate wound healing.[8]

Case Reports

Case report #1. Patient #1 was an 11-year-old male with a history of EDS type II diagnosed at 10 years of age. His skin was flexible and loose around the joints. He was prone to large subcutaneous hematomas, and his skin was fragile and would easily tear after minor trauma. The skin held sutures, and his wounds healed with scarring. He presented to our office with a one-week-old soft tissue injury over the anterior aspect of his left lower extremity. This occurred while playing soccer. There was significant skin loss over the area with resultant eschar formation. On initial examination, the eschar had separated from the 5cm x 5cm wound bed, which contained some underlying granulation tissue (Figure 1A). The initial management consisted of wet-to-dry dressings with normal saline solution.

One week later, the patient returned to the office. The wound bed appeared healthy with continued presence of granulation tissue but without other signs of healing or wound contraction. Due to suboptimal healing, the patient was taken to the operating room one week later where BSE was placed onto the wound (Figure 1B). A sterile dressing was applied, and a splint was fabricated for immobilization.

The BSE was examined on post-operative Day 5 and appeared viable with adherence to the underlying wound. Daily dressing changes consisted of application of antibiotic ointment, nonstick gauze, and the splint. Weekly follow-up visits continued, and by post-op Day 30, the wound was completely healed with good cosmetic results (Figure 1C).

Case report #2. Patient #2 was a nine-year-old female with EDS type I diagnosed at two years of age. She had the typical features of velvety skin that is hyperelastic and fragile. Her skin would tear, even after minor trauma, and would not hold sutures. Her parents reported that these minor wounds might take up to four months to heal and there was unsightly scarring of the healed wounds. She had a history of bilateral hip dysplasia and a left club foot. This patient presented to the authors’ office four weeks after a sutured repair of a laceration of the posterior aspect of the right lower extremity. The wound had dehisced. Necrotic tissue at the inferior aspect of the wound was debrided after suture removal, and daily dressings of collagenase and polysporin powder were prescribed and continued at home. On a follow-up visit a week later, the wound measured 3cm x 5cm with a granulating base (Figure 2A).

Two weeks after the first visit and after re-evaluation and determination of poor healing, the wound was debrided in the operating room and Bse was placed onto the wound (Figure 2B). Antibiotic ointment and a nonstick gauze dressing were applied.

References: 

References

1. Prockop D, Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G. Heritable disorders of connective tissue. In: Isselbacher K, Braunwald E, Wilson J, et al. (eds). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, Thirteenth Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994:2105–17.
2. Pyeritz R. Ehlers- Danlos syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342(10):730–2.
3. Maltz SB, Fantus RJ, Mellett MM, et al. Surgical complications of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV. J Trauma 2001;51(2):387–90.
4. Lindgren VV, Hollister DW, Marshall WR. Wound healing and unsatisfactory scars. Plast Reconst Surg 1987;80(2):321–2.
5. Zarem H, Lowe N. Benign growths and generalized skin disorders. In: Aston S, Beasley R, Thorne C (eds). Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery, Fifth Edition. Philadelphia, PA: Raven-Lippencott, 1997:141–59.
6. Freeman RK, Swegle J, Sise MJ. The surgical complications of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Am Surg 1996;62:869–73.
7. Atillasoy E. Current and investigative uses of Graftskin (Apligraf) in wound care. Wounds 2000;12(5 Suppl A):3A.
8. Schmid P. Immunuhistologic characterization of Graftskin (Apligraf). Wounds 2000;12(5 Suppl A):4A–11A.
9. Ehlers E. Cutis laxa, neigung zu haemorrhagien in der haut, lockerung mehrerer artikulationen. Derm Zschr [Denmark] 1901;8:173–5.
10. Danlos M. Un cas de cutis laxa avec tumeurs par contusion chronique des coudes et des genoux. Bull Soc Franc Dermatol Syphiligr [France] 1908;19:70–2.
11. Beighton P. The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. In: Beighton P. Mckusick’s Heritable Disorders of Connective Tissue, Fifth Edition. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1993:189–251.
12. Beighton P. The Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. London, England: Heinemann Medical, 1970:15–42, 109.
13. Ablaza VJ, Berlet AC, Manstein ME. An alternative treatment for the split skin-graft donor site. Aesth Plast Surg 1997;21:207–9.
14. Bell E, Ehrlich HP, Buttle DJ, et al. Living tissue formed in vitro and accepted as skin-equivalent tissue of full thickness. Science 1981;211:1052–4.
15. Eaglstein WH, Falanga V. Tissue engineering for skin: An update. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;39(6):1007–10.
16. Milstone LM, Asgari MM, Schwartz PM, et al. Growth factor expression, healing, and structural characteristics of Graftskin (Apligraf). Wounds 2000;12(5 Suppl A):12A–19A.
17. Atillasoy E. The safety and efficacy of Graftskin (Apligraf) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Wounds 2000;12(5 Suppl A):20A–26A.
18. Falanga V, Margolis D, Alvarez O, et al. Rapid healing of venous ulcers and lack of clinical rejection with an allogenic cultured human skin equivalent. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:293–300.
19. McGinnis T. Significant FDA approvals in 2000. Am Fam Phys 2001;63(10).
20. Sabolinski ML, Veves A. Graftskin (Apligraf) in neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Wounds 2000;12(5 Suppl A):33A–36A.

21. Eaglstein WH, Iriondo M, Laszlo K. A Composite skin substitute (Graftskin) for surgical wounds. Dermatol Surg 1995;21:839–43.
22. Waymack P, Duff RG, Sabolinski M. The effect of a tissue engineered bilayered living skin analog over meshed split-thickness autografts on the healing of excised burn wounds. Burns 2000;26:609–19.
23. Still JM, Craft-Coffman B. Graftskin (Apligraf) in the management of thermal injury. Wounds 2000;12(5 Suppl A):58A–63A.
24. Falabella A, Valencia I, Eaglstein W, et al. Tissue-engineered skin ( Apligraf) in the healing of patients with epidermolysis bullossa wounds. Arch Dermatol 1999;135:1219–22.
25. Streit M, Bohlen LM, Braathen LR. Ulcerative sarcoidosis successfully treated with Apligraf. Dermatology 2001;202:367–70.