A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice


Subscribe Current Issue Archives Continuing Education Submit an Article Contact Us
Search Articles:
Wounds Home
Current Issue
Archives
Search Articles
Subscribe to Wounds
Industry News
New Products
Classifieds
Continuing Education
Supplements
Enewsletters
Editorial Board
Contact Us
Author Instructions
Rapid Review
About Us

Bioengineered skin equivalent
Negative pressure wound therapy
Acellular dermal matrix
Diabetic neuropathy
Silver dressings
Enzymatic debridement

Autolytic debridement
Wound necrosis
Surgical debridement
Mechanical debridement
Wound fibroblasts
Delayed wound healing
Impaired wound healing
Compression stockings
Diabetic foot wounds
Pressure dressing
Bullous Pemphigoid with Atypical Presentation
Diagnostic Dilemmas:
Bullous Pemphigoid with Atypical Presentation

- Bahar Dasgeb, MD; Margaret S. Lee-Bellantoni, MD, PhD; Tania J. Phillips, MD, FRCPC


Download CME information and evaluation form

Presentation

       A 63-year-old white woman presented with a rash on all extremities and the face, conjunctivitis, and painful perioral and oral mucosal erosions. She denied pharyngeal or esophageal dysphagia. The patient was afebrile and denied weakness, malaise, or other constitutional symptoms. Her past medical history was significant for lung cancer, diagnosed 1 year prior to presentation, which was currently in remission. The patient also had a past medical history of dry eye syndrome and hypertension. She underwent initial chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy with gefitinib (Iressa, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, Del) 250 mg/day, a medication indicated for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer,1 and had been taking this medication for 7 months at the time of presentation to the dermatology clinic. She was also on cyclosporine ophthalmic drops (for dry eye syndrome), verapamil, atenolol, and hydrocortithiazide/triamterene (for hypertension). Her only known drug allergy was to trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole.

Physical Examination

       On examination, the patient had multiple erythematous papules and plaques up to 1.5 cm in diameter on the extensor aspect of all extremities with greater involvement of the arms than legs. Two erythematous pruritic pustules were noted on the dorsum of the right hand. Palms and soles were spared. The facial exam was significant for periorbital erythema with severe conjunctivitis bilaterally and multiple skin lesions. Erythematous 3–6 mm papules, some with excoriations, were found on the nose, lateral cheeks, and ears. Perioral lesions consisted of papules, pustules, small erosions with erythema and crusting of the lips, and lateral commissures. There were 2 shallow 1 cm x 2 cm plaques of leukoplakia on the dorsal tongue. The gingivae were erythematous and edematous with < 1 mm white spherical lesions at the gingival border of the lower jaw. The patient also had generalized xerosis. No lymphadenopathy was noted (Figures 1–3).
Figure 3
Figure 2
Periorbital erythema with severe conjunctivitis and multiple erythematous papules on the nose and around the mouth.
Figure 1


Laboratory Values

       Blood work revealed leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was 37, and creatine (Cr) was within normal limits. Sedimentation rate was 38, C-reactive protein (CRP) was within normal limits, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (C-ANCA and P-ANCA) were negative.
       Biopsies were taken of a pustule on the dorsal right hand and submitted for histopathology and direct immunofluorescence. The histopathology report for the right arm revealed orthokeratosis, focal spongiosis, neutrophilic exocytosis, papillary dermal edema, interstitial neutrophilic infiltrate, and extravasated erythrocytes. The report for the left arm revealed interface dermatitis and perivascular/interstitial mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate (lymphocytes and neutrophils).
       A direct immunofluorescent (DIF) report revealed linear IgG at the dermal-epidermal junction. Results of an indirect immunofluorescent (IIF) report are shown in Table 1.
Table 1


Diagnosis

       The patient was diagnosed with bullous pemphigoid. Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease caused by autoantibodies to the BP230 and BP180 hemidesmosomal proteins in the epidermal basement membrane, which stimulate a cascade of complement and inflammatory mediators.2 Bullous pemphigoid occurs most often in the elderly at an average age of 65 years, presumably due to immune senescence in the skin.3 There are idiopathic and drug-induced forms that manifest as the classic tense bullous eruption or localized, nodular, vegetating, erythrodermic, eczematous, or erosive lesions.4 Mucosal involvement has been found in only in 8–39% of cases.5 Drugs previously reported to cause BP include penicillins, furosemide, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), captopril, phenacetin, penicillamine, and terbinafine.4,6,7
       According to 1 report, the subtype of benign mucous membrane pemphigoid may be associated with lung cancer.8 In a series of 1,113 documented cases of BP in Japan, 5.8% were associated with internal malignancies as compared to 0.61% of age-matched controls, although the most common malignancy was gastric cancer.9 The authors believed the patient was in remission from cancer at the time she developed BP, which suggests either an undetected relapse or another predisposition to BP, possibly from gefitinib therapy. Human squamous cell carcinoma, a subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer, is characterized by abnormal expression and distribution of BP180,10 which may underlie a mechanism for carcinogenesis and also predispose the patient to developing autoimmunity to BP180.

Immunopathology

       Autoantibodies in BP target the BP230 and BP180 antigens, which are located in the hemidesmosomal complex of the skin basement membrane zone.2 Autoantibodies detected in patients with BP are probably pathogenic as indicated by both in-vivo and in-vitro models of disease.11 Subsequent complement activation recruits chemical and cellular immune mediators to the skin, ultimately resulting in blister formation.2 Ultrastructural studies demonstrate that early blister formation in BP occurs in the lamina lucida between the basal call membrane and the lamina densa.12 Both autoantibodies and complement may be detected by various immunofluorescent, immune electron microscopy, and molecular biology techniques.2
       Direct immunofluorescence. Direct immunofluorescence of perilesional skin from pemphigoid patients reveals immunoreactant deposited in a lineal pattern at the epidermal basement membrane.13,14 IgG is detected in most patients with BP; IgG4 is the predominant subclass followed by IgG1.15 However, IgD, IgE, or IgA can be found in association with IgG at the basement membrane.16
       Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). Indirect immunofluorescence indicates that about 70 to 80% of patients with BP are found to have circulating IgG that bind to the basement membrane of normal stratified squamous epithelia, such as human epidermis or monkey esophagus. Most patients with circulating anti-basement membrane IgG also have anti-basement membrane IgG in their sera.16,17 In contrast to pemphigus, in BP the IIF antibody titer does not usually correlate with disease extent or activity.17 If the immunofluorescence substrate is incubated first in 1M NaCl to separate the epidermis from the dermis at the lamina lucida, an even higher percentage of patients will have detectable circulating antibody.16 This IIF method is more sensitive for detection of circulating anti-basement membrane zone antibodies when NaCl-separated skin rather than intact human skin is employed as substrate.18 In addition to increased sensitivity, the other advantage of this “salt split” substrate is that BP antibodies bind to the roof of the artificially induced blister and thus can be differentiated from the antibodies of patients with epidermolysis bullosa aquisita, whose antibodies bind to the floor of the blister.18

Management

       With a preliminary clinical diagnosis of erythema multiforme or Stevens-Johnson syndrome from gefitinib therapy and oral/perioral candidiasis with possible bacterial or viral conjunctivitis, the patient was started empirically on oral acyclovir, clotrimazole, nystatin cream for external perioral candidiasis and perleche, erythromycin ophthalmic ointment, and palliative anesthetic mouthwash containing lidocaine, aluminum hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide, and diphenhydramine. Gefitinib was discontinued under the care of the patient’s oncologist, and biopsies were obtained for histopathology and direct immunofluorescence. The diagnoses of paraneoplastic pemphigus and bullous lupus erythematosus were also considered.
       At the follow-up visit, based on the aforementioned histopathology and direct immunofluorescence report, the authors narrowed the differential diagnosis down to acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis (Sweet’s syndrome), bullous pemphigoid with atypical clinical presentation, bullous lupus erythematosus, and a possible drug eruption. At this point, another sample for IIF was sent to Beutner Laboratory Inc. (Buffalo, NY).
       The IIF report, the predominance of IgG4 and strongly positive anti-basement membrane zone antibodies, and the DIF report of linear IgG at the dermal-epidermal junction are highly suggestive of BP14,15 with atypical clinical presentation. Bullous pemphigoid with nonclassical papular, vesicular, herpetiform, pustular, and/or eczematous clinical presentation has been reported in the literature, especially in association with antibodies directed at dermal antigens, such as 200 kDa.19 The classical antigens of BP—BP180kDa and BP230kDa—are well known. Immunoprecipitation studies have reported the presence of antibodies including 170kDa and 200kDa protein.20,21 Immunoprecipitation would be the next step to confirm that specific antigen.20 However, since all BP patients respond very well to immunosuppression therapy, immunoprecipitation is usually applied for academic purposes rather than clinical management. There have been few reports of possible associations between BP and malignancies.9,10 However, malignancy-associated or paraneoplastic BP remains a controversial issue.
       Considering positive anti-basal cell cytoplasm IgG and IgG4 and weakly positive anti-nucleotide antibody (ANA), it would be difficult to rule out the possibility of drug eruption.22 However, none of the patient’s medication was known to cause such cutaneous manifestations. The inflammation caused by initial pathogenic antibodies of BP may damage the basal cells and, as a result, may lead to secondary non-pathogenic antibodies in these patients. However, the manufacturer of gefitinib reports that the most common side effects are diarrhea, rash (morphology not specified), acne, dry skin, nausea, and vomiting, which usually present within the first month of therapy. One percent of 941 patients in clinical trials and 23,000 patients in the “Expanded Access Program” experienced conjunctivitis, while 1% experienced a vesicobullous rash, and 1% had mouth ulceration.23
       The patient refused to give another blood sample for analysis of double strand DNA to further investigate the possibility of bullous lupus erythematosus. However, a weakly positive ANA is not suggestive of this diagnosis.
       Negative intercellular Abs and desmoglein 1 and 3 in IIF and ELISA studies ruled out the diagnosis of paraneoplastic pemphigus and pemphigus vulgaris, respectively. Finally, based on available laboratory results and the patient’s clinical course, the rare possibility of coexisting BP with Sweet’s syndrome cannot be excluded.

Patient Management

       The patient was started on prednisone 60 mg/day with gradual tapering. The clinical response was rapid and satisfactory. In the course of 6 months follow-up, no new skin lesions or evidence of cancer recurrence were found.




References

1. Ross JS, Schenkein DP, Pietrusko R, et al. Targeted therapies for cancer 2004. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122(4):598–609.
2. Walsh SR, Hogg D, Mydlarski PR. Bullous pemphigoid: from bench to bedside. Drugs. 2005;65(7):905–926.
3. Loo WJ, Burrows NP. Management of autoimmune skin disorders in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2004;21(12):767–777.
4. Yeh SW, Ahmed B, Sami N, Razzaque Ahmed A. Blistering disorders: diagnosis and treatment. Dermatol Ther. 2003;16(3):214–223.
5. Mutasim DF. Autoimmune bullous dermatoses in the elderly: diagnosis and management. Drugs Aging. 2003;20(9):663–681.
6. Hodak E, Ben-Shetrit A, Ingber A, Sandbank M. Bullous pemphigoid—an adverse effect of ampicillin. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1990;15(1):50–52.
7. Aksakal BA, Ozsoy E, Arnavut O, Ali Gurer M. Oral terbinafine-induced bullous pemphigoid. Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37(11):1625–1627.
8. Greer KE, Beacham BE, Askew FC Jr. Benign mucous membrane pemphigoid in association with internal malignancy. Cutis. 1980;25(2):183–185.
9. Ogawa H, Sakuma M, Morioka S, et al. The incidence of internal malignancies in pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid in Japan. J Dermatol Sci. 1995;9(2):136–141.
10. Yamada T, Endo R, Tsukagoshi K, et al. Aberrant expression of a hemidesmosomal protein, bullous pemphigoid antigen 2, in human squamous cell carcinoma. Lab Invest. 1996;75(4):589–600.
11. Lever WF. Pemphigus and pemphigoid. A review of the advances made since 1964. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1979;1(1):2–31.
12. Beutner EH, Lever WF, Witebsky E, Jordon R, Chertock B. Autoantibodies in pemphigus vulgaris: response to an intercellular substance of epidermis. JAMA. 1965;192:682.
13. Jordon RE, Beutner EH, Witebsky E, Blumental G, Hale WL, Lever WF. Basement zone antibodies in bullous pemphigoid. JAMA. 1967;200(9):751–756.
14. Bird P, Friedmann PS, Ling N, Bird AG, Thompson RA. Subclass distribution of IgG autoantibodies in bullous pemphigoid. J Invest Dermatol. 1986;86(1):21–25.
15. Stanely JR. Bullous pemphigoid. In: Freedburg IM, ed. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2003:574–580.
16. Parodi A, Rebora A. Serum IgE antibodies bind to the epidermal side of the basement membrane zone splits in bullous pemphigoid. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126(5):526.
17. Sams WM Jr, Jordon RE. Correlation of pemphigoid and pemphigus antibody titres with activity of disease. Br J Dermatol. 1971;84(1):7.
18. Rasmussen HB, Brandrup F, Andersen J, Hagdrup H. Use of sodium-chloride separated human skin in detection of circulating anti-basement membrane zone antibodies. Acta Derm Venereol. 1989;69(6):515–519.
19. Salmhofer W, Kawahara Y, Soyer HP, Kerl H, Nishikawa T, Hashimoto T. A subepidermal blistering disease with histopathological features of dermatitis herpetiformis and immunofluorescence characteristics of bullous pemphigoid: a novel subepidermal blistering disease or a variant of bullous pemphigoid? Br J Dermatol. 1997;137(4):599–604.
20. Ebihara T, Hashimoto T, Kudoh J, Gamou S, Shimizu N, Nishikawa T. Detection of the 170-kDa bullous pemphigoid antigen by immunoprecipitation. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;100(2):176–179.
21. Mascaro JM Jr, Zillikens D, Giudice GJ, et al. A subepidermal bullous eruption associated with IgG autoantibodies to a 200 kd dermal antigen: the first case report from the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(2 Pt 2):309–315.
22. ten Veen JH, Feltkamp TE. Studies on drug induced lupus erythematosus in mice. I. Drug induced antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Clin Exp Immunol. 1972;11(2):265–276.
23. Iressa [package insert]. Wilmington, Del: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2003.

Wounds - ISSN: 1044-7946 - Volume 17 - Issue 7 - July 2005 - Pages: 196 - 202



Supplements:

Special Publication:
The following is a collection of publications from Healthpoint intended to facilitate expeditious, cost-effective wound care management. There will be nine publications total.

Related Links:
Symposium on Advanced Wound Care (SAWC)
The Buck Stops Here
Association of Advanced Wound Care
Ostomy/Wound Management
Podiatry Today
Vascular Disease Management
Wound Healing Society

Article Submission:
All submissions for consideration should be submitted online using the Rapid Review Web-Based Review System at www.rapidreview.com. Authors should scroll down to HMP Communications and click on Author.


© 2008 HMP Communications | All Rights Reserved
83 General Warren Blvd | Suite 100 | Malvern, PA 19355