Use of Mouse Footpad Model to Test Effectiveness of Wound Dressings
- Thu, 9/4/08 - 11:52am
- 0 Comments
- 3481 reads
Introduction
Acemannan is a complex carbohydrate isolated from the clear gel in the center of the aloe vera leaf, which consists of polymerized beta-(1,4)-linked acetylmannose. Molecular weight after purification varies from 10-1000kDa with an average of 200kDa. The precise size depends on the degree of degradation during the manufacturing process. Acemannan does not appear to be mitogenic for monocytes, macrophages, or fibroblasts and is noncytotoxic even at high concentrations.[1–3]
Many wound dressings, such as alginates and hydrocolloids, contain various forms of carbohydrates.[4] Differences in carbohydrate chemical structure can lend different properties and functions to wound dressings, such as improvement of absorption, increased binding, or improved retention of moisture. At a cellular level, some carbohydrates appear to stimulate cell functions of proliferation, migration, and cytokine production.[5–10]
Early reports in the literature indicate carbohydrates can enhance wound repair by promoting early mobilization of macrophages to a wounded area.[11] Periwound injections of macrophages activated by the carbohydrate glucan caused an increase in fibroblast proliferation, fibrogenesis, collagen synthesis, epithelialization, and an increase in the tensile strength of the wound.[11] This was presumed to be due to the effect of glucan-induced interleukin-1 (IL-1), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-apha) on the wound fibroblasts.[11,12] Topical application of glucans to wounds seems to result in more rapid angiogenesis and reepithelialization compared to controls.[12] Other carbohydrate extracts have been shown to accelerate healing of open wounds and burns.[13,14] These extracts stimulate oxygen consumption, increase angiogenesis, and increase collagen synthesis in the wounds.[13]
Because aloe vera sap and acemannan gel have been reported to enhance wound healing, the following experiments were designed to determine if acemannan could enhance healing and to investigate possible mechanisms of the activity of acemannan. The wound model used in this study was adopted and modified from the methods developed previously by others.[11,15] The method developed by these authors has the twin merits of simplicity and speed. The reader chooses which wound of a pair has healed (if any) as well as gives each wound a subjective score. When read blind, the presence of a control on the opposite foot provides an additional measure of wound healing by providing a basis for comparison as well as a control for any bias in the reader’s scoring. This model is simple, yet quick and reliable. The reproducibility and reliability come from the use of blinds and multiple controls. The basic experimental unit consisted of two groups, each of 30 mice. One group of mice in each experiment had controls in both feet, while the other group received control in one foot and treatment in the opposite foot. All experiments were performed blind.
Materials and Methods
Mice. Male Swiss-Webster mice weighing approximately 20g were obtained from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. (Indianapolis, Indiana). Groups of 30 mice were wounded on the posterior tarsus of both feet after being anesthetized with 0.6mL of a mixture of sodium pentothal, propylene glycol, 90-percent ethanol, and sterile distilled water administered intraperitoneally. A 5mm incision was made through the thickness of the skin between the Achilles tendon and the external vestigial finger parallel to the posterior tarsal vein. Immediately after making the incision, one wound was treated with one drop of test material. A 2mm x 4mm piece of sterile parafilm (Parafilm™, American National Can, Chicago, Illinois) was inserted into the wounds to ensure even distribution of the solutions and to prevent rapid adhesion of the wound edges. The parafilm fell out within 24 hours without further intervention.
References
1. Womble D, Helderman JH. Enhancement of allo-responsiveness of human lymphocytes by acemannan (Carrisyn™). Int J Immunopharm 1988;10:967–74.
2. Kahlon JB, Kemp MC, Yawei N, et al. In-vitro evaluation of the synergistic antiviral effects of acemannan in combination with azidothymidine and acyclovir. Mol Biother 1991;3:214–23.
3. Johnson AR, White AC, McAnalley B. Comparison of common topical agents for wound treatment: Cytotoxicity for human fibroblasts in culture. Wounds 1989;1:186–92.
4. Wiseman DM, Rovee DT, Alvarez OM. Wound dressings: Design and use. In: Cohen IK, Diegelmann RF, Lindblad WJ (eds). Wound Healing: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company, 1992:572–3.
5. Grasdaleh H, Larsen B, Smidrod O. A P.M.R. study of the composition and sequence of uronate residues in alginates. Carbohydrate Research 1979;68:23–31.
6. Turner TD, Spyratou O, Schmidt RJ. Biocompatibility of wound management products: Standardization of and determination of cell growth rate in L929 fibroblast cultures. J Pharm Pharmacol 1989;41:775–80.
7. Schimdt RJ, Spyratou O, Turner TD. Biocompatibility of wound management products: The effect of various monosaccharides on L929 and 2002 fibroblast cells in culture. J Pharm Pharmacol 1989;41:781–4.
8. Doyle JW, Roth TP, Smith RM, et al. Effect of calcium alginate on cellular wound healing processes modeled in vitro. J Biomed Materials Research 1996;32:561–8.
9. Ramamoorthy L, Kemp MC, Tizard IR. Effect of acemannan on the production of cytokine in a macrophage cell line RAW264.7. Abstract 16: ETRS Amsterdam, Netherlands, August 22–25, 1993.
10. Ramamoorthy L, Kemp MC, Tizard IR. Acemannan, a _-(1,4)-acetylated mannan, induces nitric oxide production in macrophage cell line RAW 264.7. Molecul Pharmacol 1996;50:878–84.
11. Wolk M, Danon D. Promotion of wound healing by yeast glucan evaluated on single animals. Med Bio 1985;63:73–80.
12. Browder W, Williams D, Lucore P, et al. Effect of enhanced macrophage function on early wound healing. Surg 1988;104:224–30.
13. Kaplan JZ. Acceleration of wound healing by a live yeast cell derivative. Arch Surg 1984;119:1005–8.
14. Bentley M, Hunt TK, Weiss JB, et al. Peptides from live yeast cell derivative stimulate wound healing. Arch Surg 1990;125:641–6.
15. Leibovich SJ, Danon D. Promotion of wound repair in mice by application of glucan. J Reticul Soc 1980;27:1–11.
16. Luna LG (ed). Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Third Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1968:94–5.
17. Hasenclever HF, Mitchell WO. Immunochemical studies on polysaccharides of yeasts. J Bact 1964;93:763–71.
18. Burgaleta C, Golde DW. Effect of glucan on granulopoiesis and macrophage genesis in mice. Cancer Res 1977;37:1739–42.
19. Kenyon AJ, Douglas DM, Hamilton SG. Defective macrophage function in wound repair of P/J mice. Lab Animal Sci 1985;35(2):150–2.
20. Zhang L, Tizard IR. Activation of mouse macrophage cell line by acemannan: The major carbohydrate fraction from Aloe vera gel. Immunopharmacology 1996;35:119–28.
21. White AC. Monocyte/macrophage uptake of 14C labeled acemannan in vitro. Carrington Research Document #4009, 1988.
22. Ezekowitz RAB, Williams DJ, Koziel H, et al. Uptake of Pneumocystis cranii mediated by the macrophage mannose receptor. Nature 1991;351:155–8.
23. Leibovich SJ, Ross R. The role of the macrophage in wound repair: A study with hydrocortisone and antimacrophage serum. Am J Path 1975;78:71–4.
24. Tizard IR, Busbee D, Maxwell B, et al. Effects of acemannan, a complex carbohydrate, on wound healing in young and aged rats. Wounds 1994;6(6):201–9.
25. Tizard IR. Immunology, Second Edition. New York, NY: WB Saunders Co., 1988:190–1, 250.
26. Sheets MA, Unger BA, Giggleman GF, Tizard IR. Studies of the effect of acemannan on retrovirus infections: Clinical stabilization of feline leukemia virus-infected cats. Mol Biother 1991;3:41–5.
27. Harris C, Pierce K, King G, et al. Efficacy of acemannan in treatment of canine and feline spontaneous neoplasms. Mol Biother 1991;3:207–13.
28. Helle M, Brakenhoff JPJ, De Groot ER, Aarden LA. Interleukin 6 is involved in interleukin 1 induced activities. Euro J Imm 1988;18:957–59.
29. Le J, Vilcek J. Biology of disease: Tumor necrosis factor and interleukin 1—Cytokines with multiple overlapping biological activities. Lab Invest 1987;56:234–48.
30. Sauder DN, Kilian PL, McLane JA, et al. Interleukin-1 enhances epidermal wound healing. Lymphokine Res 1990;9:465–73.







