A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice


Subscribe Current Issue Archives Continuing Education Submit an Article Contact Us
Search Articles:
Wounds Home
Current Issue
Archives
Search Articles
Subscribe to Wounds
Industry News
New Products
Classifieds
Continuing Education
Supplements
Enewsletters
Editorial Board
Contact Us
Author Instructions
Rapid Review
About Us

Bioengineered skin equivalent
Negative pressure wound therapy
Acellular dermal matrix
Diabetic neuropathy
Silver dressings
Enzymatic debridement

Autolytic debridement
Wound necrosis
Surgical debridement
Mechanical debridement
Wound fibroblasts
Delayed wound healing
Impaired wound healing
Compression stockings
Diabetic foot wounds
Pressure dressing
Editorial Message
Editor's Message:
Editorial Message

- David T. Rovee, PhD


November, 2006

Dear Readers,

       The use of silver nitrate and silver sulfadiazine (SSD) has been common in burns for many years. SSD has also been used to treat chronic and acute wounds by some clinicians. Over the last several years, silver-containing dressings have become available and are widely used mainly for the treatment of chronic wounds, such as venous, diabetic, and pressure ulcers. These dressings are used in an attempt to reduce the bacterial levels in the contaminated ulcers to a level which can be handled by the patients’ immune system, thus preventing infection. White and Cutting (Exploring the effects of silver in wound management—what is optimal?) conclude that, “silver dressings when used responsibly are of great clinical value.” These authors present a thoughtful assessment of the value, potential pitfalls, what is known, and what remains to be learned about the use of silver products in wound treatment. The antibacterially active form of silver is generally believed to be the monovalent cation Ag+, which is active at very low levels (~50 parts per billion in aqueous systems). These low concentrations of Ag+ have been shown to be active against most planktonic bacteria and also effective in destabilizing biofilms. Much of the published work on silver dressings reports results from in-vitro testing; however, the authors stress that, “the clinical result is the ultimate test…ie, does it work in practice?” This should be required reading for all involved in the research, development, and use of silver-containing dressings for wound treatment.

       Yilmaz et al (Effect of low-energy gallium arsenide [GaAs, 904 nm] laser irradiation on wound healing in rat skin) report on the effects of laser irradiation on the healing of circular excisions in animals. The use of low-level laser irradiation for wound healing remains controversial. Available research results have ranged from no effect, to a deleterious effect, to a positive effect. Under the conditions of this carefully controlled study, the findings suggest that laser irradiation “negatively affects the normal wound healing process.” The effects were statistically significant for the high dose GaAs laser.

       Rottman and Glat (The use of a biologic tissue matrix [Integra™ bilayer matrix wound dressing] in the treatment of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pseudosyndactyly deformity) report their results in treating mitten deformity (pseudosyndactyly) in 2 cases. Following the surgical procedures for contracture release, the wounds were treated with a bilayer matrix wound dressing (BLM). This material was selected because of its physical properties and reported success in decreasing the incidence of postoperative wound contractures in burn patients. The use of bioengineered skin equivalents (BSE) has shown some success in the treatment of mitten deformity in previously published studies. In the 2 cases reported here, the authors achieved excellent results treating the wounds sequentially with BLM followed by BSE. A discussion of the details and the approach is presented.

 


Wounds - ISSN: 1044-7946 - Volume 18 - Issue 11 - November 2006 - Pages: A10 - A10




CME Supplement
Sponsored by Healthpoint



Maintenance Debridement in the Treatment of Difficult-to-Heal Chronic Wounds


Supplements:

Special Publication:
The following is a collection of publications from Healthpoint intended to facilitate expeditious, cost-effective wound care management. There will be nine publications total.

Related Links:
Symposium on Advanced Wound Care (SAWC)
The Buck Stops Here
Association for the Advancement of Wound Care
Ostomy/Wound Management
Podiatry Today
Today's Wound Clinic
Vascular Disease Management
Wound Healing Society

Article Submission:
All submissions for consideration should be submitted online using the Rapid Review Web-Based Review System at www.rapidreview.com. Authors should scroll down to HMP Communications and click on Author.




About HMP Communications

HMP Communications LLC (HMP) is the authoritative source for comprehensive information and education servicing healthcare professionals. HMP’s products include peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals, national tradeshows and conferences, online programs and customized clinical programs. HMP is a wholly owned subsidiary of HMP Communications Holdings LLC, which also owns the North American Center for Continuing Medical Education (NACCME). NACCME provides a wide array of accredited CME offerings with industry thought leaders participating in roundtable meetings, webcasts, symposia, conferences, seminars, podcasts and satellite programs. Discover more about HMP’s products and services at www.hmpcommunications.com. ©2008 HMP Communications

© 2008 HMP Communications | All Rights Reserved
83 General Warren Blvd | Suite 100 | Malvern, PA 19355