Tissue Engineering and Wound Healing: An Overview of the Past, Present, and Future
- Thu, 9/4/08 - 11:52am
- 0 Comments
- 9388 reads
The term tissue engineering was introduced in 1987 during a meeting of the National Science Foundation. It is the application of principles and methods of engineering and life sciences toward the fundamental understanding of structure-function relationships in normal and pathological mammalian tissue, and the development of biological substitutes to restore, maintain, or improve tissue function.1 Tissue engineering can be considered a multidisciplinary technology used to reach a universal goal—to grow and expand tissues in vitro from donor cells (grow-your-own).
The success of tissue engineering relies on mimicking the composition and structure of the original tissue. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to understand the fundamentals of cells and cell-to-cell interactions in vivo. It is also important to understand the behavior of cell lines and cultures in vitro. Much research focuses on the use of tissue engineering in wound care and dermal tissue regeneration.
This review provides an overview of the history and techniques of tissue engineering, current wound healing-related research, available tissue-engineered wound dressings, and future challenges.
History of Tissue Engineering
Providing a history of tissue engineering it is inevitable to return to the basics, starting in 1665, when Hooke2 (1635–1703) discovered small holes in cross-sections, which he called cells and described in his book Micrographia. In 1805, Oken3 stated,“All life is based on individual cells.”
In 1838–1839, Schleiden4 and Schwann5 formulated the so-called “Cell Theory” based on their microscopic findings.This theory summarized their findings as:
• The cell is the unit of structure,physiology, and organization in living things
• The cell retains a dual existence as a distinct entity and a building block in the construction of organisms
• Cells form by free-cell formation, similar to the formation of crystals (spontaneous generation).
References
1. Bell E, Ehrlich HP, Buttle DJ, Nakatsuji T. Living tissue formed in vitro and accepted as skin-equivalent tissue of full thickness. Science. 1981;211(4486):1052–1054.
2. Hooke R. Micrographia, or some physiological descriptions of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses with observations and inquiries thereupon. London, England: Royal Society; 1665.
3. Oken L. Die Zeugung. Lehrbuch der Naturphilosophie. Germany: Böhlaus; 1805.
4. Schleiden MJ. Beiträge zur phytogenesis. Müller’s Arch Anat Physiol Wissenschaftliche. 1838:136–178.
5. Schwann T. Mikroskopische Untersuchungen über die Übereinstimmung in der Struktur und dem Wachsthum der Thiere und Pflanzen. Harri, Germany: Verslag der Sander’schen Buchhandlung; 1839.
6. Virchow R. Die Cellular-Pathologie in ihrer Begründung auf physiologische und pathologische Gewebelehre. Berlin, Germany:A. Hirschwald; 1858.
7. Thiersch C. Ueber die feineren anatomischen Veränderungen bei Aufheilung von Haut auf Granulationen. Verhandlungen der deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. 1874;3:69–75.
8. Loeb L. Uber die Entstehung von Bindegewebe, Leukocyten und roten Blutkorperchen aus Epithel und uber eine Methode, isolierte Gewebsteile zu zuchten. Stern; 1897.
9. Harrison RG. Observations on the living developing nerve fiber. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1907;4:140–143.
10. Carrel A. On the permanent life of tissues outside of the organism. J Exp Med. 1912;15(5):516–528.
11. Rous P, Jones FS.A method for obtaining suspensions of living cells from the fixed tissues, and for the planting out of individual cells. J Exp Med. 1916;23:549–555.
12. Enders JF.General preface to studies on the cultivation of poliomyelitis viruses in tissue culture. J Immunol.1952;69(6):639–643.
13. Amit M, Carpenter MK, Inokuma MS, et al. Clonally derived human embryonic stem cell lines maintain pluripotency and proliferative potential for prolonged periods of culture. Dev Biol. 2000;227(2):271–278.
14. Yang X, Qu L,Wang X, et al. Plasticity of epidermal adult stem cells derived from adult goat ear skin. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007;74(3):386–396.
15. Lodish H,Baltimore D,Darnell JE. Multicellularity: cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. In:Tenney S, ed. Molecular Cell Biology. 3rd ed. New York,NY:WH Freeman; 1995.
16. Marcacci M, Berruto M, Brocchetta D, et al.Articular cartilage engineering with Hyalograft C: 3-year clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(435):96–105.
17. Park SN, Lee HJ, Lee KH, Suh H. Biological characterization of EDC-crosslinked collagen-hyaluronic acid matrix in dermal tissue restoration. Biomaterials. 2003;24(9):1631–1641.
18. Bilodeau K, Mantovani D. Bioreactors for tissue engineering: focus on mechanical constraints. A comparative review. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(8):2367–2383.
19. Griffith LG, Naughton G. Tissue engineering—current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science. 2002;295(5557):1009–1014.
20. Lee SJ. Cytokine delivery and tissue engineering. Yonsei Med J. 2000;41(6):704–719.
21. Alemdaroglu C, Degim Z, Celebi N, Zor F, Ozturk S, Erdogan D. An investigation on burn wound healing in rats with chitosan gel formulation containing epidermal growth factor. Burns. 2006;32(3):319–327.
22. Nimni ME. Polypeptide growth factors: targeted delivery systems. Biomaterials. 1997;18(18):1201–1225.
23. Heldin P, Laurent TC, Heldin CH. Effect of growth factors on hyaluronan synthesis in cultured human fibroblasts. Biochem J. 1989;258(3):919–922.
24. Steed DL. Clinical evaluation of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor for the treatment of lower extremity diabetic ulcers. Diabetic Ulcer Study Group. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21(1):71–78.
25. Sohier J, Hamann D,Koenders M, et al.Tailored release of TGF-beta1 from porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Pharm. 2007;332(1–2):80–89.
26. Sherris DA, Murakami CS, Larrabee WF Jr., Bruce AG. Mandibular reconstruction with transforming growth factor-beta1. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(3):368–372.
27. Steinbrech DS, Mehrara BJ, Rowe NM, et al. Gene expression of TGF-beta, TGF-beta receptor, and extracellular matrix proteins during membranous bone healing in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(6):2028–2038.
28. Dinbergs ID, Brown L, Edelman ER. Cellular response to transforming growth factor-beta1 and basic fibroblast growth factor depends on release kinetics and extracellular matrix interactions. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(47):29822–29829.
29. Phillips GD, Whitehead RA, Stone AM, Ruebel MW, Goodkin ML, Knighton DR. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) stimulation of angiogenesis: an electron microscopic study. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 1993;25(2):149–155.
30. Blottner D,Wolf N, Lachmund A, Flanders KC, Unsicker K. TGF-beta rescues target-deprived preganglionic sympathetic neurons in the spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci. 1996;8(1):202–210.
31. Beck LS, Chen TL, Mikalauski P,Ammann AJ. Recombinant human transforming growth factor-beta 1 (rhTGF-beta 1) enhances healing and strength of granulation skin wounds. Growth Factors. 1990;3(4):267–275.
32. Chin D, Boyle GM, Parsons PG, Coman WB.What is transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta)? Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57(3):215–221.
33. Bettinger DA, Yager DR, Diegelmann RF, Cohen IK. The effect of TGF-beta on keloid fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(5):827–833.
34. Hosokawa R, Nonaka K, Morifuji M, Shum L, Ohishi M. TGF-beta 3 decreases type I collagen and scarring after labioplasty. J Dent Res. 2003;82(7):558–564.
35. Levine JH, Moses HL, Gold LI,Nanney LB. Spatial and temporal patterns of immunoreactive transforming growth factor beta 1, beta 2, and beta 3 during excisional wound repair. Am J Pathol. 1993;143(2):368–380.
36. Kohama K, Nonaka K, Hosokawa R, Shum L, Ohishi M. TGF-beta-3 promotes scarless repair of cleft lip in mouse fetuses. J Dent Res. 2002;81(10):688–694.
37. Holland TA, Mikos AG.Advances in drug delivery for articular cartilage. J Control Release. 2003;86(1):1–14.
38. Eriksson E,Vranckx J.Wet wound healing: from laboratory to patients to gene therapy. Am J Surg. 2004;188(1A Suppl):36–41.
39. Frey EF. The earliest medical texts. Clio Med. 1985;20(1–4):79–90.
40. Caldwell MD.Topical wound therapy—an historical perspective. J Trauma. 1990;30(12 Suppl):S116–S122.
41. Harding KG, Jones V, Price P. Topical treatment: which dressing to choose. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000;16(Suppl 1):S47–S50.
42. George G. Wound Management. Richmond, Va: PJP Publications; 1996.
43. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193:293–294.
44. Breuing K, Eriksson E, Liu P, Miller DR. Healing of partial thickness porcine skin wounds in a liquid environment. J Surg Res. 1992;52(1):50–58.
45. Vogt PM,Andree C, Breuing K, et al. Dry, moist, and wet skin wound repair. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34(5):493–499.
46. Jimenez PA, Jimenez SE.Tissue and cellular approaches to wound repair. Am J Surg. 2004;187(5A):56S–64S.
47. Bonadio J, Smiley E, Patil P, Goldstein S. Localized, direct plasmid gene delivery in vivo: prolonged therapy results in reproducible tissue regeneration. Nat Med. 1999;5(7):753–759.
48. Luu YK, Kim K, Hsiao BS, Chu B, Hadjiargyrou M. Development of a nanostructured DNA delivery scaffold via electrospinning of PLGA and PLA-PEG block copolymers. J Control Release. 2003;89(2):341–353.
49. Murphy WL, Mooney DJ. Controlled delivery of inductive proteins, plasmid DNA and cells from tissue engineering matrices. J Periodontal Res. 1999;34(7):413–419.
50. Shea LD, Smiley E, Bonadio J, Mooney DJ. DNA delivery from polymer matrices for tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17(6):551–554.
51. Haslik W, Kamolz LP, Nathschlager G, Andel H, Meissl G, Frey M.First experiences with the collagen-elastin matrix Matriderm as a dermal substitute in severe burn injuries of the hand. Burns. 2007;33(3):364–368.
52. van Zuijlen PP, van Trier AJ,Vloemans JF,Groenvelt F,Kreis RW,Middelkoop E.Graft survival and effectiveness of dermal substitution in burns and reconstructive surgery in a one-stage grafting model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(3):615–623.
53. Jahoda CA, Reynolds AJ. Hair follicle dermal sheath cells: unsung participants in wound healing. Lancet. 2001;358(9291):1445–1448.
54. Chan ES, Lam PK, Liew CT, Lau HC,Yen RS, King WW.A new technique to resurface wounds with composite biocompatible epidermal graft and artificial skin. J Trauma. 2001;50(2):358–362.
55. Lam PK, Chan ES, To EW, Lau HC, Yen SC, King WW. Development and evaluation of a new composite Laserskin graft. J Trauma. 1999;47(5):918–922.
56. Gartner LP, Hiatt JL. Integument. In: Color Textbook of Histology. Philadelphia, Pa:WB Saunders; 1997.
57. Tsai CC, Lin SD, Lai CS, Lin TM.The use of composite acellular allodermis-ultrathin autograft on joint area in major burn patients—one year follow-up.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1999;15(11):651–658.
58. Noordenbos J, Dore C, Hansbrough JF. Safety and efficacy of TransCyte for the treatment of partial-thickness burns. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1999;20(4):275–281.
59. Boyd M, Flasza M, Johnson PA, Roberts J, Kemp P. Integration and persistence of an investigational human living skin equivalent (ICX-SKN) in human surgical wounds. Regen Med. 2007;2(4):363–370.
60. Bock AK, Ibaretta D, Rodriguez-Cerezo E. Human tissueengineered products—today’s markets and future prospects. Seville, Spain: Joint Research Centre European Commission; 2003.
61. Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418(6893):41–49.







