****The Effect of Monochromatic Infrared Energy on Transcutaneous Oxygen Measurements and Protective Sensation: Results of a C

Author(s): 
Holly Franzen-Korzendorfer, PT, PhD, FACCWS; Mary Blackinton, PT, MS, EdD; Shari Rone-Adams, PT, DBA; and Joseph McCulloch, PT, PhD, FAPTA, FACCWS

Limitations

Limitations of this study include the small sample size and small effect size. A Type II error (failure to identify an existing difference) may have occurred because the assumptions on which this study was designed were not realized — a large effect size and a sample size of 20. The effect size was small, demonstrated by the low change scores, and only 18 patients met the study inclusion criteria.

This study could not demonstrate a significant impact of MIRE on circulation using TcPO2 measurements, partly because of a lack of power related to the sample size and the unequal baseline distribution for this variable as a result of randomization. However, this finding was surprising, given claims of circulation increases up to 3,200% based on laser Doppler images.9,11 No participants improved to the literature-supported27 threshold of 25 mm Hg difference for intra-week variation.

Additionally, 31 feet had TcPO2 measurements (average of two dorsal sites) from pre- to posttest within ±11 mm Hg, with only eight feet varying more than 11 mm Hg between pre- and posttest measurements. Three of the eight feet had TcPO2 change scores of 11.5 mm Hg; thus, only five feet varied more than 11.5 mm Hg. These findings are consistent with TcPO2 reliability studies19,26 reporting repeated measurements in shorter time frames and indicate the observed change was a normal variation of TcPO2 testing (±11 mm Hg) instead of a treatment effect. These scores may further support the use of TcPO2 testing as a measure of perfusion over time.

Implications

This study demonstrated no statistically significant treatment effect for MIRE compared to sham on a small group of persons with diabetes who served as their own controls. This study calls into question results of previous studies that demonstrate significantly improved sensation with MIRE treatments. In this study, significant improvements in sensation were observed in both the sham and active treatment group but no differences were found between the two treatment groups on any of the outcome measures studied. This is not to say that MIRE is completely ineffective; as described in the literature review, previous research has demonstrated restored protective sensation.1,2,6,23,28,29 Because no other modality or intervention has been reported in the literature to restore protective sensation in the same manner, this remains an interesting and valuable avenue for future research. For now, clinicians using MIRE should be aware that the evidence supporting restored sensation may not be as strong as previously reported.

Recommendations

To answer some of the remaining questions surrounding the effectiveness of MIRE, this study should be repeated using a larger sample size and with patients who do not serve as their own control. Including more objective measurements of nerve response, such as current perception threshold, also would be valuable.

Observed improvements in both the active and sham groups warrants further research because it may have a physiological basis or represent a Hawthorne or placebo effect. Studies that continue to use patients as their own control could help determine if a more general physiological effect to the contralateral limb occurs. Additionally, it would be interesting to assess if any other modality — eg, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) — has the ability to alter sensation in persons with diabetes and LOPS.

References: 

1. Kochman AB, Carnegie DH, Burke TJ. Symptomatic reversal of peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002;92(3):125–130.
2. Leonard DR, Farooqi HM, Myers S. Restoration of sensation, reduced pain, and improved balance in subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:168–172.
3. Prendergast JJ, Miranda G, Sanchez M. Improvement of sensory impairment in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Endocr Prac. 2004;10:24–30.
4. Cavanagh PR, Ulbrecht JS, Caputo GM. The biomechanics of the foot in diabetes mellitus. In: Bowker JH, Pfeifer MA, eds. Levin and O’Neal’s The Diabetic Foot. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby, Inc.;2001:181.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States, 2002. Available at: at www.diabetes.org. Accessed March 12, 2004.
6. Kochman AB. Monochromatic infrared photo energy and physical therapy for peripheral neuropathy: influence on sensation, balance, and falls. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2004;27:16–19.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States, 2005. Available at: www.diabetes.org. Accessed March 14, 2006.
8. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CMS Decision Memo. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy with loss of protective sensation (LOPS) (CAG-00059N). Available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/search.asp?clickon=search. Accessed April 16, 2004.
9. Burke TJ. 5 Questions — and answers — about MIRE treatment. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003;16:369–371.
10. Goldberg N. Monochromatic infrared photo energy and DPN. Diabetic Microvascular Complications Today. 2005;March/April:30–32.
11. Burke TJ. Nitric oxide: its role in diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, and wound healing. Vol. 2005: Diabetes In Control, 2004. Available at: www.diabetesincontrol.com/anodyne/burkeseries.shtml. Accessed January 14, 2005.
12. Horwitz LR, Burke TJ, Carnegie D. Augmentation of wound healing using monochromatic infrared energy. Adv Skin Wound Care. 1999;12:35–40.
13. Rich K. Transcutaneous oxygen measurements: implications for nursing. J Vasc Nurs. 2001;19:55–61.
14. Sheffield PJ, Buckley CJ. Transcutaneous oximetry: a sophisticated tool for assessing tissue oxygenation and potential for wound healing. In: Sheffield PJ, Fife CE, Smith APS, eds. Wound Care Practice. Flagstaff, Ariz: Best Publishing Co.;2004:117–136.
15. Clarke D. Transcutaneous monitoring of pO2 in hyperbaric medicine. Patient Focus Circle™, Vol. DK-2700. Denmark: Radiometer Medical A/S;1997:1–20.
16. Nicasio M, Larson-Lohr V, Kimbrell P. Transcutaneous oxygen measurements. In: Larson-Lohr V, Norvell HC, eds. Hyperbaric Nursing. Flagstaff, Ariz: Best Publishing Co.;2002:304–314.
17. Anodyne® Therapy System Professional Unit 480 JCAHO policy and procedure manual. Vol. 2004: Anodyne® Therapy, 2004.
18. Clifft J, Kasser RJ, Newton TS, Bush AJ. The effect of monochromatic infrared energy on sensation in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2896–2900.
19. Wimberley P, Burnett R, Covington A, et al. Guidelines for transcutaneous po2 and pco2 measurement. Clinica Chimica Acta. 1990;190:S41–S50.
20. Lukkari-Rautiainen E, Lepantalo M, Pietila J. Reproducibility of skin blood flow, perfusion pressure and oxygen tension measurements in advanced lower limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1989;3:345–350.
21. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease. Feet Can Last a Lifetime: a health care provider’s guide to preventing diabetes foot problems. National Diabetes Education Program;2004.
22. Jörneskog G. Measurements of transcutaneous oxygen tension in patients with diabetic foot complications. Denmark: Radiometer Medical;AS 132; 2001;May 1:1–3.
23. Volkert W, Hassan A, Smock VL, et al. Effectiveness of monochromatic infrared photo energy and physical therapy for peripheral neuropathy: changes in sensation, pain, and balance — a preliminary, multi-center study. Phys Occupational Ther Geriatr. 2005;24:1–17.
24. Dowd G, Linge K, Bentley G. Measurement of transcutaneous oxygen pressure in normal and ischaemic skin. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65(suppl B):79–83.
25. Dowd G, Linge K, Bentley G. The effect of age and sex of normal volunteers upon the transcutaneous oxygen tension in the lower limb. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1983;4:65–68.
26. Olerud JE, Pecoraro RE, Burgess EM, et al. Reliability of transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPo2) measurements in elderly normal subjects. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1987;47:535–541.
27. de Graaff JC, Ubbink DT, Legemate DA, de Haan RJ, Jacobs J. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of peripheral blood and oxygen pressure measurements in the assessment of lower extremity arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:1033–1040.
28. DeLellis SL, Carnegie DH, Burke TJ. Improved sensitivity in patients with peripheral neuropathy: effects of monochromatic infrared photo energy. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:143–147.
29. Harkless L, DeLellis SL, Carnegie DH, Burke TJ. Improved foot sensitivity and pain reduction in patients with peripheral neuropathy after treatment with monochromatic infrared photo energy — MIRE. J Diabetes Complic. 2006;20:81–87.



bendjaminsays: November 27.2009 at 05:34 am

Very interesting article. Thanks. I used it in my student work.

Ben Stokson
---
my hobby: electric infrared heaters

Reply to this comment »

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Use to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.