Peripheral Arterial Perfusion: Is it Adequate for Wound Healing?

Author(s): 
DeAnna Holtman, NP and Vivian Gahtan, MD

     More than 8 million Americans are affected by peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD).1 The presence of PAOD can seriously inhibit the ability of a lower extremity ulceration to heal. Many wounds will not heal unless adequate arterial perfusion is reestablished. Traditionally, revascularization was achieved by open surgical bypass,2 but recent advances in percutaneous angioplasty and stenting techniques have provided new options. These innovations offer promising new treatment alternatives for those patients who were previously considered unsuitable candidates for open procedures or for those whose wounds overlie the path of standard surgical incisions.3,4 Clinicians must be able to recognize wounds whose healing potential is compromised by PAOD so that revascularization can be undertaken before tissue loss progresses to the point that limb preservation is not an option.

     

Patient Evaluation

Identification of patients with inadequate perfusion for healing is critical. Initial assessment of any wound begins with a complete history and a thorough physical examination.

     History. The existence of risk factors for PAOD should alert the clinician to the possibility of an arterial insufficiency component that may adversely affect wound healing. Commonly identified risk factors include diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, hyperlipidemia, cigarette smoking, and hypertension.5

     Reports of intermittent claudication should increase the clinician’s suspicion of PAOD. Claudication is reproducible leg pain that occurs when a stenotic or occlusive lesion prevents sufficient arterial blood flow from meeting the increased metabolic needs of an exercising muscle.6 Classically, pain or cramping occurs repeatedly in the posterior calf after walking approximately the same distance and is relieved by rest. Claudication pain may also occur in the posterior thigh, buttock, or hip, and rarely in the foot.7

     Ischemic rest pain may occur in an advanced disease state. This is severe pain, typically localized in the dorsal aspects of the toes and distal forefoot.6 Ischemic rest pain is experienced most frequently at night when the extremities are elevated in bed. The pain is reduced with dependency and affected patients will often hang their leg over the side of the bed or get up to walk in an effort to relieve the pain.

     Current and previous wound care regimens and the clinical response should be reviewed in detail. Reasonable regimens with increasing tissue loss should also alert the clinician that a vascular etiology should be considered. A history of revascularization with a lack of response to treatment should warrant reassessment of the revascularization for technical adequacy and the patient’s foot perfusion.

     Physical examination. Physical examination findings that are indicative of PAOD include atrophic skin changes, which suggest a lack of adequate arterial perfusion. The skin covering the lower extremity and foot is thin, taut, and shiny.8 Thinning or actual loss of the hair over the distal third of the leg and the foot will typically occur. The skin is cool to the touch, pale, or even mottled, while toenails become thick and dystrophic.

     Extremities affected by PAOD will frequently display Buerger’s sign, characterized by dependent rubor and pallor with elevation from chronic dilatation of the vascular bed.6 This physical sign is due to loss of vasomotor control of the microcirculation and is seen in cases of advanced ischemia.9 When in a dependent position, a deep, dusky red or “ruddy” flush spreads proximally from the toes over the dorsum of the foot.

References: 

1. Almahameed A. Peripheral arterial disease: recognition and medical management. Cleve Clin J Med. 2006;73(7):621–634.
2 Kudo T, Chandra FA, Kwun WH, Haas BT, Ahn SS. Changing pattern of surgical revascularization for critical limb ischemia over 12 years: endovascular vs. open bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(2):304–313.
3. Kudo T, Chandra FA, Ahn SS. The effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of critical limb ischemia: a 10-year experience. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(3):423–435.
4. Clair DG, Dayal R, Faries PL, et al. Tibial angioplasty as an alternative strategy in patients with limb-threatening ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005;19(1):63–68.
5. Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2000. Circulation. 2004;110(6):738–743.
6. Rutherford RB. Initial Patient Evaluation: The Vascular Consultation. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000:1–13.
7. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006;113(11):e463–654.
8 Sieggreen MY, Kline RA. Arterial insufficiency and ulceration: diagnosis and treatment options. Nurs Pract. 2004;29(9):46–52.
9. Abularrage CJ, Sidawy AN, Aidinian G, Singh N, Weiswasser JM, Arora S. Evaluation of the microcirculation in vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(3):574–581.
10. Cox NH. Management of lower leg cellulitis. Clin Med. 2002;2(1):23–27.
11. Hess CT. Clinical Guide to Wound Care. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Ambler, PA; 2005.
12. DeWeese JA, Leather R, Porter J. Practice guidelines: lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18(2):280–294.
13. Gahtan V. The noninvasive vascular laboratory. Surg Clin North Am. 1998;78(4):507–518.
14. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(1 Pt 2):S1–S296.
15. Sieggreen MY, Kline RA. Arterial insufficiency and ulceration: diagnosis and treatment options. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2004;17(5 Pt 1):242–251.
16. Moffatt C. Four-layer bandaging: from concept to practice Part 2: application of the four-layer system. Available at: http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2005/march/Moffatt/Four-Layer-Bandage-Sys.... Accessed: March 2005.