Index: WOUNDS 2011;23(7):184–189

Abstract: Background. It was hypothesized that the rate of wound closure and the number of grafts required will be the same when treating diabetic foot ulcers with TheraSkin®, a cryopreserved split-thickness skin allograft (SSA), as compared to Apligraf®, a bioengineered skin substitute (BSS). Methods. A prospective study using sequentially enrolled patients seen in a large podiatric practice encompassing multiple locations was conducted. Patients were sequentially enrolled and treated with either BSS or SSA. All other factors of treatment were standardized across the patient population. Data analysis included an analysis of co-factors in each group in order to determine if anything else may have influenced the outcomes. Results. Data from 17 wounds (16 patients) treated with BSS and 12 wounds treated with SSA were analyzed. The average wound sizes were comparable, as was the average number of applications utilized. These data revealed that 41.3% of the wounds treated with BSS closed within 12 weeks, as compared to 66.7% of the wounds treated with SSA. At 20 weeks, 47.1% of the wounds in the BSS group closed, while 66.7% of the SSA wounds closed. There were a comparable number of adverse events in each group, none of which were a direct result of the biologic material being used. Conclusion. SSA resulted in a higher percentage of wounds closing after 12 and 20 weeks, as compared to wounds treated with BSS. There were no adverse events noted that were directly related to either graft material.

Dear Readers,

Index: WOUNDS 2011;23(7):204–215

Abstract:
  Soft tissue wound healing is a complex and well-orchestrated sequence of events on multiple biological levels involving systemic, cellular, and molecular signals. The physiological process of wound healing leads to full tissue repair and regeneration with nearly complete restoration of tissue integrity and functionality.

  Wounds, particularly among the elderly population, can show delayed or disturbed healing; however, delayed or disturbed healing is also evident in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes, atherosclerosis, venous/arterial insufficiency, reduced mobility due to chronic infirmity, and hypercholesterolemia.

  Chronic wounds consist of a wide range of inflammatory and degenerative conditions of the musculoskeletal system. Management of chronic, difficult to heal, or non-healing soft tissue wounds requires a multidisciplinary approach. Often these treatment options have inconsistent and irregular outcomes. Poor response or failure to conservative treatments places a substantial burden on patients, their families, the healthcare system, and society in general. Therefore, the development of a new, effective method of treatment to improve healing of problematic wounds and reduce treatment-related costs is extremely valuable; ne such therapy is Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT).

  ESWT acts through mechanotransduction, which produces therapeutic benefits through complex biological pathways including neovascularization and tissue regeneration in the therapeutic target. Published data thus far suggest that the application of ESWT for soft tissue indications is safe, reliable, cost-effective, and clinically efficacious. The exact biological effects of ESWT on human cells are not completely understood, but are currently undergoing further study.

  The aim of this review is to provide a general overview of shockwave therapy and its role in the treatment of acute and chronic soft tissue wounds.