Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Review

Acidic Environment and Wound Healing: A Review

January 2015
1044-7946
WOUNDS. 2015;27(1):5-11.

Abstract

Introduction. Topical application of acids, such as citric acid, acetic acid, ascorbic acid, boric acid, and algenic acid, to wounds to control infection and to promote healing has been reported in various earlier studies.   The present review summarizes the role of surface pH and acidic environment in the process of wound healing, and attempts to cover recent developments in wound healing with special reference to acidic environment and its physiological effects on the wound healing process. Methods. A literature search was performed in PubMed using appropriate keywords, as well as a manual search using references cited in original publications and relevant review articles. Out of 115 articles found, 45 of the most relevant articles were evaluated and analyzed, and relevant data were included. Results. The studies show that an acidic environment created by use of acid helps in wound healing by controlling wound infection, increasing antimicrobial activity, altering protease activity, releasing oxygen, reducing toxicity of bacterial end products, and enhancing epithelization and angiogenesis. Conclusion. The current review of the literature indicates the acidic environment plays an important role in the promotion of wound healing.

Introduction

  Wound healing is a complex physiological process involving tissue repair and regeneration. A wound is “a break in the continuity of tissue, from violence or trauma,” and is regarded as healed if there is a restoration of the wounded or inflamed tissue to normal condition.1 Wound healing is influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Hemostasis and inflammation, proliferation, and maturation or remodeling are the distinct, overlapping phases involved in wound healing.2 Altered or impaired wound healing, as seen in chronic wounds, is marked by an interruption of this process. Presence of bacteria and bacterial products, such as endotoxins and metalloproteinases, can cause disturbances in this orderly scheme and affect each of the healing processes.3

  The pH value within the wound milieu directly and indirectly influences all biochemical reactions taking place in the process of wound healing.4 It has been proven that the surface pH of a wound plays an important role in wound healing as it helps control infection and increase antimicrobial activity, oxygen release, angiogenesis, protease activity, and bacterial toxicity. Therefore, pH value affects the regular cellular events in wound healing. It has also been observed that wounds with a high alkaline pH have a lower healing rate in both acute and chronic wounds as compared to wounds with a pH closer to neutral. Wound healing progression decreases when pH is elevated to alkaline condition. The environment of acute as well as chronic wounds progresses from an alkaline state to a neutral state and then to an acidic state when healing begins.5-9

  This literature search on chronic wounds shows that the complex process of healing an infected wound can be affected by surface pH. This review highlights the importance of an acidic environment and its physiological effects on the wound healing process.

Methods

  A literature search was performed using PubMed, as well as a manual search using references cited in original publications and relevant review articles. For the search of the PubMed database, the key words used were “acetic acid,” “ascorbic acid,” “boric acid,” “citric acid,” “acid environment,” and “surface pH.” All studies commenting on the role of acid in wound healing were included in the present review. A large number of papers reporting use of acetic and citric acids for treatment of infected wounds, and showing primitive and similar types of results were excluded. A few papers reporting use of other acids with primitive and inconclusive findings were also excluded. A total of 115 articles were found, out of which 45 of the most relevant articles were included in the present review. All included studies were evaluated and analyzed, and all relevant data were included.

Results

  Using the previously listed key words, a total of 115 articles pertaining to acidic environment and wound healing were found. After reading the title and abstracts, 70 articles out of the 115 were excluded because of repetitive or similar findings. The findings of 45 different studies were analyzed and evaluated, and the detailed results of these studies are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

  These studies show that an acidic environment created by use of acids, such as acetic acid, boric acid, ascorbic acid, alginic acid, and hyaluronic acid, help in wound healing by controlling wound infection, increasing antimicrobial activity, altering protease activity, releasing oxygen, reducing toxicity of bacterial end products, and enhancing epithelization and angiogenesis.

Discussion

 Use of acids for treatment of wounds. The use of various acids, such as acetic acid, boric acid, ascorbic acid, alginic acid, and hyaluronic acid, has been reported for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, and burn wound infections in various earlier studies. For the past 19 years, the authors have used citric acid in their practice for the effective treatment of chronic wound infections caused by a variety of bacterial pathogens, and for the treatment of chronic wounds that are not responding to conventional injectable or oral antibiotic therapy and local wound care management. Efforts to decrease wound surface pH using topical agents have had varying degrees of efficacy. Dilute acetic acid has been successfully used for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, and burn wound infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Acetic acid in 1% and 5% concentrations has been widely used in an attempt to reduce pH. Application of sterile gauze swabs soaked in 1%-5% concentrations to ulcers and burn wounds has been used in different studies.10-14 Topical application of acetic acid in a concentration of 5% to burn and soft tissue wounds has been found to be an effective treatment for P. aeruginosa infections.10-14 A 0.5% acetic acid irrigation solution is effective in clearing P. aeruginosa from contaminated or infected wound beds. Though not bactericidal, acetic acid creates an acidic environment unfavorable for growth of P. aeruginosa.15 Thus, irrigation of wounds with acetic acid solution proved to be effective in clearing P. aeruginosa from wound beds. Lowering of pH on the surface of a wound has been demonstrated to accelerate wound healing. Three percent boric acid has been used in the treatment of local pseudomonal wound infections in which antibiotics had been found to yield little lasting success. Boric acid was used locally and achieved good success in less than 6 days on average without any toxic side effects.16 Two percent ascorbic acid was also found effective in the treatment of second degree burn injuries infected with P. aeruginosa.17 Application of hyaluronic acid to wounds was found significantly more effective and safe in the treatment of leg ulcers of venous or mixed origin.18

  Based on these studies, the authors initiated the successful use of citric acid in a concentration of 2%- 3% for the treatment of pseudomonal wound infections.19-21 Later, 3% citric acid was used locally to treat a variety of chronic wounds such as diabetic foot infections, burn wound infections, lepromatous ulcers, postoperative wound infections, snake-bite ulcers, chronic traumatic wounds, nonhealing ulcers, and necrotizing fasciitis. These wounds were not only caused by P. aeruginosa but also by a variety of other bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Citrobacter spp., S. epidermidis, streptococci, and enterococci.22-30

  The use of honey dressings to alter surface pH has been reported by Gethin.7 It has been observed that an increase in pH decreases reduction in wound size. However, dressings with honey having a pH of 3.5 causes significant reduction in wound size due to significant lowering of wound surface pH.7

Role of Acid in Wound Healing

  The application of acid significantly contributes to the wound healing process in the following ways.

  Infection control. Infection is one of the most prevalent causes for nonhealing and chronicity of wounds.31,32 Chronicity begins with bacteria. The presence of bacteria and bacterial products, such as endotoxins and metalloproteinases, can cause disturbances in the orderly scheme of wound healing, thereby affecting each of the phases of healing.31,32 Thus, infection is a common reason for poor wound healing, especially in chronic wounds, so significant reduction in the number of bacteria is important in the management of chronic wounds. Most of the pathogenic bacteria associated with infected wounds in humans need a pH value > 6; their growth is inhibited by lower pH values.33-35 Applying acids to the wound surface lowers the pH of the infected surfaces and makes an environment unsuitable for the growth and multiplication of the bacteria. This has been proved by microbiological studies and the rapid clearing up of infected surfaces.36 Thus, application of acid is effective in clearing bacterial pathogens from contaminated or infected wound beds by creating an acidic environment unfavorable for the growth of bacterial pathogens present on the wound surface (Table 1).

  Increase in antimicrobial activity. Various acids have been shown to increase the antimicrobial activity of topical antimicrobials such as iodine and silver that are incorporated into wound dressings.37,38 The bioavailability of active free metal ions in a wound is affected by numerous factors including the metal ion solubility which is known to increase with a decrease in pH.39,40 It has been experimentally proven that pH affects the activity of silver-containing wound dressings on antibiotic-resistant bacteria.38 It has been found that a decrease in pH from 8.5 to 5.5 enhances the activity of silver dressings against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.38 These findings substantiate that pH of the wound surface plays an important role in antimicrobial activity and enhances the performance of silver.41 It has been shown that the use of 2% ascorbic acid to create an acidic medium in tropical climates, where the warm weather and alkalinity of the medium renders 0.1% silver sulfadiazine less effective, potentiates the effect of silver sulfadiazine, thereby making it more effective.17 The alginate wound dressings containing alginic acid make the wound environment slightly more acidic, which helps to enhance the performance and bioavailability of ionic silver present in alginate wound dressings.38,42 By ensuring maximum antimicrobial performance of a wound dressing, it could be possible to achieve positive clinical outcomes. The silver alginate dressing demonstrated a broad spectrum of antimicrobial barrier activity within the dressing against all wound isolates including Candida albicans and a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus strain at a pH of 5.5 compared with a pH of 7.6,42

  Alteration of protease activity. Proteases are enzymes with the ability to cleave proteins. They are produced by the wound itself as well as by bacteria. The enzymatic activity of proteases is dependent on the amount of proteases and presence of protease inhibitors.6 Every protease enzyme shows optimum and maximum enzyme activity at a certain pH value, at which the protein is broken down more rapidly than at other pH values. For example, the enzymes elastase and plasmin show optimum enzymatic activity at a pH of 8, neutrophil elastase is maximally active at a pH of 8.3, and the enzyme urease, produced by bacteria, is more active in alkaline conditions. It appears proteases are more active in alkaline conditions and their end products are toxic to wound tissues. The lowering of pH to a more acidic environment may reduce the activity of these enzymes, thereby reducing the formation and toxicity of their end products.43

  Release of oxygen. Oxygen is the basic requirement for survival of cells in the human body and oxygenation of wounds is of vital significance in the wound healing process. It has been observed that a lower degree of oxygenation impairs immunity and the process of wound repair. The majority of the oxygen is required for oxidant-radical production (ie, for killing bacteria). This is a mainstay of immunity to bacterial infection caused by staphylococci, E. coli, Klebsiella, and other bacteria commonly involved in wound infections. Oxygen is also required for collagen synthesis and epithelization. The release of oxygen is influenced by the acidic environment. A low pH value leads to the Bohr-effect (ie, an increase of the amount of available oxygen of cells).9,44 The delivery of oxygen to damaged tissue, especially in chronic wounds, depends on perfusion as well as diffusion. Improvement in tissue oxygenation increases resistance to infection and promotes healing.45,46 A lowering of pH by 0.6 units releases 50% more oxygen and a shift of pH by 0.9 units causes 5-fold increase in release of oxygen.9 The local tissue oxygen partial pressure (PO2) is needed to force oxygen into injured and healing tissues. The process of wound healing, especially in chronic wounds, is comparatively higher if PO2 is > 40 mm Hg; however, the healing process is impaired when a PO2 is < 20 mm Hg.45 It has been observed that any factor that could cause even a small change in pH of the wound may appreciably alter the available supply of oxygen to the tissues and impair the process of wound healing.9 The PO2 also affects replication of fibroblasts that occurs optimally at a PO2 of about 40-60 mm Hg. Epithelial cells are also affected by PO2, and it has been demonstrated that epithelization occurs better in well-oxygenated tissues. This also explains the effectiveness of hyperberic oxygen therapy.45

  Reduction of toxicity of bacterial end products. Lowering the pH and creating a more acidic environment also reduces the toxicity of bacterial end products such as ammonia, which is liberated from urea by the action of the enzyme urease. Ammonia is toxic to wound tissue and also leads to an alkaline environment, which is not suitable for the wound healing process.7

  Epithelization and angiogenesis. The acidic environment also promotes epithelization and angiogenesis. In a histopathological study on chronic wound infections, use of citric acid was shown to enhance epithelization and found to actuate the wound healing process by boosting fibroblastic growth and neovascularization, which increases microcirculation of wounds that enables the formation of healthy granulation tissue, thereby leading to faster healing of wounds.36 One of the important reasons for promotion of epithelization is increased oxygenation of local tissue because of the acidic environment.45

  Other effects. In addition to the effects on protease activity and oxygen release, the acidic environment also enhances the destruction of abnormal collagen in the ulcer bed, increases macrophage and fibroblast activity, and controls activities of various enzymes participating in the wound healing process (Table 2).45,47,48

Conclusion

  The results of different studies on the use of various acids for the treatment of wounds show the acidic environment helps in wound healing by controlling wound infections, increasing antimicrobial activity, altering protease activity, releasing oxygen, reducing toxicity of bacterial end products, and enhancing epithelization and angiogenesis. The results of this literature review also suggest that monitoring wound pH may help in the evaluation of treatment progress. The authors conclude that creating an acidic environment in a wound bed has an additional benefit that positively influences the wound healing process.

Acknowledgments

   Basavraj S. Nagoba, PhD; and Namdev M. Suryawanshi, MD are from the Maharashtra Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (MIMSR) Medical College, Latur, India. Bharat Wadher, PhD is from Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. Sohan Selkar, MPhT is from the Maharashtra Institute of Physiotherapy, Latur, India.

Address correspondence to:
B. S. Nagoba, PhD
Assistant Dean, Research and Development
MIMSR Medical College
Latur – 413 531 (M.S.) India
dr_bsnagoba@yahoo.com

  Disclosure: The authors disclose no financial or other conflicts of interest.

References

1. Thomas CL, ed. Taber’s Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary. 17th ed. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers;1993. 2. Witte MB, Barbul A. General principles of wound healing. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(3):509-528. 3. Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, et al. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130(4):489-493. 4. Schneider LA, Korber A, Grabbe S, Dissemond J. Influence of pH on wound-healing: a new perspective for wound-therapy? Arch Dermatol Res. 2007;298(9):413-420. 5. Roberts G, Hammad L, Creevy J, Shearman C, Mani R. Physical changes in dermal tissues around chronic venous ulcers. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; November 18-20, 1997; Harrogate, UK. J Eur Wound Manage Assoc. 1997:104-105. 6. Hoffman R, Noble J, Eagle M. The use of proteases as prognostic markers for the healing of venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care. 1999; 8(6):273-276. 7. Gethin G. The significance of surface pH in chronic wounds. Wounds UK. 2007;3(3):52-56. 8. Tsukada K, Tokunga K, Iwama T, Mishima Y. The pH changes of pressure ulcers related to the healing process of wounds. WOUNDS. 1992;4(1):16-20. 9. Leveen HH, Falk G, Borek B, et al. Chemical acidification of wounds. An adjuvant to healing and the unfavorable action of alkalinity and ammonia. Ann Surg. 1973;178(6):745-753. 10. Philips I, Lobo AZ, Fernandes R, Gundara NS. Acetic acid in the treatment of superficial wounds infected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Lancet. 1968;291(7532):11-13. 11. Milner SM. Acetic acid to treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa in superficial wounds and burns. Lancet. 1992;340(8810):61. 12. Sloss JM, Cumberland N, Milner SM. Acetic acid used for the elimination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from burn and soft tissue wounds. J R Army Med Corps. 1993;139(2);49-51. 13. Nagoba BS, Deshmukh SR, Wadher BJ, Patil SB. Acetic acid treatment of pseudomonal postoperative wound infection. J Hosp Infect. 1997;36(3):243-244. 14. Nagoba B, Wadher B, Kulkarni P, Kolhe S. Acetic acid treatment of pseudomonal wound infections. Eur J Gen Med. 2008;5(2):104-106. 15. Miller JM, Creazzo BS, Witt C. Wound healing: An introductory clinical approach. Contemp Podiatr Physician. 1992;1(2):38-42. 16. Kujath P, Hugelschaffer C. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenicity, prevention and therapeutic approaches [in German]. Zentralbl Chir. 1987;112(9):558-563. 17. Mujumdar RK. Treatment of resistant pseudomonas infection in burn patients in tropical climate using acidic medium, oxidizing agent and metronidazole. Indian J Surg. 1993;55:501-507. 18. Humbert P, Mikosinski J, Benchikhi H, Allaert FA. Efficacy and safety of a gauze pad containing hyaluronic acid in treatment of leg ulcers of venous or mixed origin: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Int Wound J. 2013;10(2):159-166. 19. Nagoba BS, Deshmukh SR, Wadher BJ, et al. Treatment of superficial pseudomonal infections with citric acid: an effective and economical approach. J Hosp Infect. 1998;40(2):155-157. 20. Nagoba BS, Gandhi RC, Wadher BJ, Deshmukh SR, Gandhi SP. Citric acid treatment of severe electric burns complicated by multiple antibiotic resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Burns. 1998;24(5):481-483. 21. Nagoba BS, Kulkarni PB, Wadher BJ, Kulkarni UP, Mahabaleshwar L. Citric acid treatment of diabetic foot: a simple and effective approach. J Assoc Physicians India. 2000;48(7):739-741. 22. Nagoba BS, Gandhi RC, Wadher BJ, Rao AK, Hartalkar AR, Selkar SP. A simple and effective approach for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with different Wagner grades. Int Wound J. 2010;7(3):153-158. 23. Nagoba BS, Gandhi RC, Hartalkar AR, Wadher BJ, Selkar SP. Simple, effective and affordable approach for the treatment of burns infections. Burns. 2010;36(8):1242-1247. 24. Nagoba BS, Wadher BJ, Chandorkar AG. Citric acid treatment of non-healing ulcers in leprosy patients. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146(6):1101. 25. Nagoba BS, Wadher BJ, Rao A, Selkar SP, Gandhi RC. Treatment of lepromatous ulcers using citric acid as a sole antimicrobial agent. Int Wound J. 2012;9(5):553-556. 26. Nagoba B, Raju R, Wadher B, et al. Citric acid treatment of surgical site infections: a prospective open study. Wound Pract Res. 2011;19(2):82-86. 27. Nagoba B, Rao A, Wadher B, Gugale D, Mantri S. A simple and effective approach for treating non-healing ulcers after a snakebite. WOUNDS. 2011;23(8):252–255. 28. Nagoba B, Gandhi R, Wadher B, Rao A, Selkar S. Simple and effective approach for the treatment of traumatic wounds in non-diabetic patients: a prospective open study. Int Wound J. 2013;10(5):585-589. 29. Nagoba BS, Gandhi RC, Wadher BJ, Gandhi SP, Selkar SP. Citric acid treatment of necrotizing fasciitis: a report of two cases. Int Wound J. 2010;7(6):536-538. 30. Nagoba BS, Wadher BJ, Rao AK, Kore GD, Gomashe AV, Ingle AB. A simple and effective approach for the treatment of chronic wound infections caused by multiple antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli. J Hosp Infect. 2008;69(2):177-180. 31. Tarnuzzer RW, Schultz GS. Biochemical analysis of acute and chronic wound environments. Wound Repair Regen. 1996;4(3):321-325. 32. Burke JF. The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery. 1961;50:161-168. 33. O’Meara S, Cullum N, Majid M, Sheldon T. Systemic reviews of wound care management: (3) antimicrobial agents for chronic wounds; (4) diabetic foot ulceration. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(21):1-237. 34. Stewart CM, Cole MB, Legan JD, Slade L, Vandeven MH, Schaffner DW. Staphylococcus aureus growth boundaries: moving towards mechanistic predictive models based on solute-specific effects. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(4):1864-1871. 35. Thomas LV, Wimpenny JW, Davis JG. Effect of three preservatives on the growth of Bacillus cereus, Vero cytotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, on plates with gradients of pH and sodium chloride concentration. Int J Food Microbiol. 1993;17(4):289-301. 36. Nagoba BS, Gandhi RC, Wadher BJ, Potekar RM, Kolhe SM. Microbiological, histopathological and clinical changes in chronic wounds after citric acid treatment. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57(5):681-682. 37. Percival SL, Thomas JG, Slone W, Linton S, Corum L, Okel T. The efficacy of silver dressings and antibiotics on MRSA and MSSA isolated from burn patients. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19(6):767-774. 38. Percival SL, Thomas J, Linton S, Okel T, Corum L, Slone W. The antimicrobial efficacy of silver on antibiotic-resistant bacteria isolated from burn wounds. Int Wound J. 2012;9(5):488-493. 39. Gupta CK. Chemical Metallurgy: Principles and Practice. Weinhiem, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2003. 40. Antoniadis V, Tsadilas C, Samras V, Sgouras J. Availability of heavy metals applied to soil through sewage sludge. In: Prasad MNV, Sajawan KS, Naidu R, eds. Trace Elements in the Environment: Biogeochemistry, Biotechnology, and Bioremediation. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2005:39-61. 41. Slone W, Linton S, Okel T, Corum LL, Thomas JG, Percival SL. The effect of pH on the antimicrobial efficiency of silver alginate on chronic wound isolates. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec. 2010;2(4):86-90. 42. Vermeulen H, van Hattem JM, Storm-Versloot MN, Ubbink DT. Topical silver for treating infected wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;24(1):CD005486. 43. Greener B, Hughes AA, Bannister NP, Douglass J. Proteases and pH in chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2005;14(2):59-61. 44. Hunt TK, Twoney P, Zederfeldt B, Dunphy JE. Respiratory gas tensions and pH in healing wounds. Am J Surg. 1967;114(2):302-307. 45. Hunt TK, Hopf HW. Wound healing and wound infection: What surgeons and anesthesiologists can do. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(3):587-606. 46. Hunt TK, Beckert S. Therapeutical and practical aspects of oxygen in wound healing. In: Lee B, ed. The Wound Management Manual. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2004:44-54. 47. Thomas S. Wound Management and Dressings. London, UK: Pharmaceutical Press; 1990. 48. Molan PC. Re-introducing honey in the management of wounds and ulcers-theory and practice. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002;48(11):28-40.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement